<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 636 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430212</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals with consequential relief. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory requirements for confiscation and penalties, the proper application of Section 123 shifting the burden of proof, and the necessity of robust evidence to support allegations of smuggling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 09:15:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 636 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430212</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals with consequential relief. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory requirements for confiscation and penalties, the proper application of Section 123 shifting the burden of proof, and the necessity of robust evidence to support allegations of smuggling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>