https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430208 The High Court upheld the decision of CESTAT, dismissing the appeals and emphasizing the lack of substantial legal questions. The court affirmed that the findings were not unreasonable, stressing the requirement for conclusive evidence to establish clandestine removal. It concluded that the retracted statements, unsupported by corroboration, were insufficient to support the revenue's assertions, leading to the dismissal of the appeals for lack of merit. en-us Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Nov 2022 09:15:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430208 The High Court upheld the decision of CESTAT, dismissing the appeals and emphasizing the lack of substantial legal questions. The court affirmed that the findings were not unreasonable, stressing the requirement for conclusive evidence to establish clandestine removal. It concluded that the retracted statements, unsupported by corroboration, were insufficient to support the revenue's assertions, leading to the dismissal of the appeals for lack of merit. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430208