https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305063 The Full Bench overturned the rejection of a pharmaceutical company's trademark infringement suit, emphasizing the plaintiff's business location in Chennai as sufficient for maintaining the suit under Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act. The Court clarified that the plaintiff's residence within the jurisdiction determined venue, not the defendant's location. The appeals were allowed, setting aside the earlier order and restoring the suit for further proceedings, with the defendant directed to file a written statement within three weeks. en-us Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Nov 2022 21:32:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305063 The Full Bench overturned the rejection of a pharmaceutical company's trademark infringement suit, emphasizing the plaintiff's business location in Chennai as sufficient for maintaining the suit under Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act. The Court clarified that the plaintiff's residence within the jurisdiction determined venue, not the defendant's location. The appeals were allowed, setting aside the earlier order and restoring the suit for further proceedings, with the defendant directed to file a written statement within three weeks. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305063