https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305071 Although no fixed statutory limitation applies to a writ petition, inordinate delay without a cogent explanation can disentitle the petitioner to equitable relief. The Calcutta HC held that a corporate litigant is expected to act through professional assistance and cannot claim the indulgence typically extended to an illiterate or remote individual. As the petitioner offered no satisfactory explanation for a delay of more than three and a half years in approaching the Court, discretionary condonation was refused and the writ petition was dismissed. en-us Mon, 18 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Apr 2025 10:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305071 Although no fixed statutory limitation applies to a writ petition, inordinate delay without a cogent explanation can disentitle the petitioner to equitable relief. The Calcutta HC held that a corporate litigant is expected to act through professional assistance and cannot claim the indulgence typically extended to an illiterate or remote individual. As the petitioner offered no satisfactory explanation for a delay of more than three and a half years in approaching the Court, discretionary condonation was refused and the writ petition was dismissed. Case-Laws GST Mon, 18 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305071