<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 106 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30923</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the denial of credit based on incorrect vehicle numbers in invoices. The appellants provided evidence, including documents with consistent truck numbers, showing receipt of inputs from a registered dealer for manufacturing final products. Despite discrepancies in the vehicle numbers, the Tribunal found the denial of credit unwarranted and allowed the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 106 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30923</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the denial of credit based on incorrect vehicle numbers in invoices. The appellants provided evidence, including documents with consistent truck numbers, showing receipt of inputs from a registered dealer for manufacturing final products. Despite discrepancies in the vehicle numbers, the Tribunal found the denial of credit unwarranted and allowed the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>