<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1616 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305056</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the criminal original petition, setting aside the orders of the Additional District and Sessions Judge and the Judicial Magistrate in a cheque bouncing case. The petitioner was directed to submit his admitted signature for comparison to determine the age of the ink on the cheque. Failure to comply would result in losing the opportunity for comparison.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 16:20:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1616 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305056</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the criminal original petition, setting aside the orders of the Additional District and Sessions Judge and the Judicial Magistrate in a cheque bouncing case. The petitioner was directed to submit his admitted signature for comparison to determine the age of the ink on the cheque. Failure to comply would result in losing the opportunity for comparison.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>