<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 878 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305050</link>
    <description>A plaint alleging passing off, copyright infringement and rendition of accounts cannot be rejected at the threshold if the averments disclose a cause of action. At the stage of summons, the court must confine itself to the plaint pleadings; the defendant&#039;s exact role in the infringement chain, the absence of cash memos, and territorial jurisdiction are not finally determinable without evidence. The suit need not be restricted to the manufacturer alone and may proceed against other parties involved in the alleged infringement. The rejection of the plaint was therefore held unsustainable and set aside, and the suit was directed to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:12:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 878 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305050</link>
      <description>A plaint alleging passing off, copyright infringement and rendition of accounts cannot be rejected at the threshold if the averments disclose a cause of action. At the stage of summons, the court must confine itself to the plaint pleadings; the defendant&#039;s exact role in the infringement chain, the absence of cash memos, and territorial jurisdiction are not finally determinable without evidence. The suit need not be restricted to the manufacturer alone and may proceed against other parties involved in the alleged infringement. The rejection of the plaint was therefore held unsustainable and set aside, and the suit was directed to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>