<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 45 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30920</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order sanctioning a refund under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act to the respondent. The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal in the Rajasthan High Court, emphasizing that passing an interim stay order would effectively review the previous decision, which was impermissible. The Tribunal held that the refund amount was subject to the High Court&#039;s decision and declined to grant an interim stay, as it would only delay implementation without valid grounds for appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 45 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30920</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order sanctioning a refund under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act to the respondent. The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal in the Rajasthan High Court, emphasizing that passing an interim stay order would effectively review the previous decision, which was impermissible. The Tribunal held that the refund amount was subject to the High Court&#039;s decision and declined to grant an interim stay, as it would only delay implementation without valid grounds for appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>