<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 1028 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305049</link>
    <description>Territorial jurisdiction under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent cannot be revoked summarily where the pleaded cause of action depends on disputed facts. In a design piracy suit under the Designs Act, 2000, the plaint alleged sale of the infringing biscuit packets within Chennai, making the jurisdictional question a mixed issue of fact and law. Because sales and distribution required evidence, the objection to jurisdiction had to be tried in the main suit rather than decided at the leave stage. The court therefore declined to apply forum conveniens to displace the pleaded jurisdictional basis and held the suit maintainable on the Original Side.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 12:49:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 1028 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305049</link>
      <description>Territorial jurisdiction under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent cannot be revoked summarily where the pleaded cause of action depends on disputed facts. In a design piracy suit under the Designs Act, 2000, the plaint alleged sale of the infringing biscuit packets within Chennai, making the jurisdictional question a mixed issue of fact and law. Because sales and distribution required evidence, the objection to jurisdiction had to be tried in the main suit rather than decided at the leave stage. The court therefore declined to apply forum conveniens to displace the pleaded jurisdictional basis and held the suit maintainable on the Original Side.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>