<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 626 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430202</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision regarding transfer pricing adjustments and disallowance of AMP expenditure. The Court held that the AMP expenditure was revenue in nature, not capital, emphasizing commercial expediency. It found no substantial question of law, upholding the ITAT&#039;s assessment and ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 626 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430202</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision regarding transfer pricing adjustments and disallowance of AMP expenditure. The Court held that the AMP expenditure was revenue in nature, not capital, emphasizing commercial expediency. It found no substantial question of law, upholding the ITAT&#039;s assessment and ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>