<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 610 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430186</link>
    <description>The CIT(A) ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the share premium received was justified using the DCF method and supported by the net asset value of the partnership firm. The additions made by the AO were deleted, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 09:01:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 610 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430186</link>
      <description>The CIT(A) ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the share premium received was justified using the DCF method and supported by the net asset value of the partnership firm. The additions made by the AO were deleted, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>