<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 605 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430181</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by removing the redundant requirement of a type approval certificate for the provisional release of a seized &#039;Toyota Alphard SC 3500 cc&#039; vehicle. Emphasizing compliance with regulatory measures post-clearance, the ruling highlighted that the vehicle&#039;s registration under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was sufficient for operational compliance, ensuring adherence to essential legal requirements for road operation in India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 09:01:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 605 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430181</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by removing the redundant requirement of a type approval certificate for the provisional release of a seized &#039;Toyota Alphard SC 3500 cc&#039; vehicle. Emphasizing compliance with regulatory measures post-clearance, the ruling highlighted that the vehicle&#039;s registration under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was sufficient for operational compliance, ensuring adherence to essential legal requirements for road operation in India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>