https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30914 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the rejection of a refund claim for supervision charges in a case involving a sugar manufacturing company. The appellant had accepted the conditions set by the Commissioner of Central Excise to store non-duty paid sugar outside the bonded store room but later sought a refund, arguing that supervision charges were not payable as per a board's circular. The Tribunal held that the appellant could not benefit from the concession and then challenge the conditions through a refund claim, emphasizing the importance of addressing conditions promptly to avoid disputes. en-us Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30914 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the rejection of a refund claim for supervision charges in a case involving a sugar manufacturing company. The appellant had accepted the conditions set by the Commissioner of Central Excise to store non-duty paid sugar outside the bonded store room but later sought a refund, arguing that supervision charges were not payable as per a board's circular. The Tribunal held that the appellant could not benefit from the concession and then challenge the conditions through a refund claim, emphasizing the importance of addressing conditions promptly to avoid disputes. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30914