<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 229 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30912</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of prohibited sandalwood goods for export due to the involvement of the appellant&#039;s authorized signatory in the violation. However, the Tribunal allowed the redemption of the confiscated goods valued at Rs. 64.00 lakhs on a fine of Rs. 8.00 lakhs, with a condition for reprocessing and exporting within three months. The penalty on the appellant-firm was reduced to Rs. 2.00 lakhs, and no penalty was imposed on the appellant&#039;s partner. The decision considered the legal purchase of goods from the Karnataka State Government Forest Department and granted lenient consideration based on the unique circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 229 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30912</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of prohibited sandalwood goods for export due to the involvement of the appellant&#039;s authorized signatory in the violation. However, the Tribunal allowed the redemption of the confiscated goods valued at Rs. 64.00 lakhs on a fine of Rs. 8.00 lakhs, with a condition for reprocessing and exporting within three months. The penalty on the appellant-firm was reduced to Rs. 2.00 lakhs, and no penalty was imposed on the appellant&#039;s partner. The decision considered the legal purchase of goods from the Karnataka State Government Forest Department and granted lenient consideration based on the unique circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>