<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 591 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430167</link>
    <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner regarding GST ITC 02A form filing. Despite portal restrictions preventing timely submission, the court directed IT Grievance Redressal Committee to consider the credit transfer claim within six weeks. The decision aligned with previous judicial precedent, recognizing technical barriers and ensuring procedural fairness in tax credit transfer processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 17:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 591 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430167</link>
      <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner regarding GST ITC 02A form filing. Despite portal restrictions preventing timely submission, the court directed IT Grievance Redressal Committee to consider the credit transfer claim within six weeks. The decision aligned with previous judicial precedent, recognizing technical barriers and ensuring procedural fairness in tax credit transfer processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>