<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 187 - HIGH COURT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30910</link>
    <description>Interim protection was warranted because no material showed why the customs licence had been limited to six months or that the petitioner was ineligible for renewal. Faced with imminent expiry, the HC directed customs authorities to extend the licence for a further three months on proper application and payment of scheduled charges, while leaving the renewal dispute open for later consideration. The pending proceedings were not to prevent examination of renewal for a longer period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 187 - HIGH COURT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30910</link>
      <description>Interim protection was warranted because no material showed why the customs licence had been limited to six months or that the petitioner was ineligible for renewal. Faced with imminent expiry, the HC directed customs authorities to extend the licence for a further three months on proper application and payment of scheduled charges, while leaving the renewal dispute open for later consideration. The pending proceedings were not to prevent examination of renewal for a longer period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>