<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 571 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430147</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the default status of the assessee under section 201(1) and the levy of interest under section 201(1A) for the relevant assessment years. This decision was based on the nature of the agreement with the developer, which was deemed to be a works contract, resulting in the assessee being held liable to deduct TDS. The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions, dismissing all appeals filed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 571 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430147</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the default status of the assessee under section 201(1) and the levy of interest under section 201(1A) for the relevant assessment years. This decision was based on the nature of the agreement with the developer, which was deemed to be a works contract, resulting in the assessee being held liable to deduct TDS. The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions, dismissing all appeals filed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>