<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 562 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430138</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax as a clearing and forwarding agent since they did not physically handle goods. The Court supported this decision by referencing the appellant&#039;s activities and the absence of physical handling of goods. The Court also clarified its jurisdiction under the relevant Act and allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant, closing the connected Miscellaneous Petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2023 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 562 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430138</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax as a clearing and forwarding agent since they did not physically handle goods. The Court supported this decision by referencing the appellant&#039;s activities and the absence of physical handling of goods. The Court also clarified its jurisdiction under the relevant Act and allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant, closing the connected Miscellaneous Petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>