<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 558 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430134</link>
    <description>A cheque issued as security can still attract Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act when the parties&#039; arrangement permits presentation on default, and the complaint is maintainable if issuance, dishonour, and non-payment after notice are disclosed. The defence that the cheque was only security and that no subsisting liability existed was treated as a disputed factual issue requiring trial, not quashing under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The statutory presumption under Section 139 remained available to the complainant at the pre-trial stage, so the complaint was allowed to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 558 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430134</link>
      <description>A cheque issued as security can still attract Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act when the parties&#039; arrangement permits presentation on default, and the complaint is maintainable if issuance, dishonour, and non-payment after notice are disclosed. The defence that the cheque was only security and that no subsisting liability existed was treated as a disputed factual issue requiring trial, not quashing under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The statutory presumption under Section 139 remained available to the complainant at the pre-trial stage, so the complaint was allowed to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>