<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 557 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430133</link>
    <description>Compounding of a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act offence was permitted on the basis of a joint compromise between the parties. The Court noted that Section 147 of the Act makes such offences compoundable notwithstanding the general framework under Section 320 CrPC, and that compounding may be allowed even at the appellate stage. In view of the settlement, the conviction and sentence could not survive and were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 15:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 557 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430133</link>
      <description>Compounding of a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act offence was permitted on the basis of a joint compromise between the parties. The Court noted that Section 147 of the Act makes such offences compoundable notwithstanding the general framework under Section 320 CrPC, and that compounding may be allowed even at the appellate stage. In view of the settlement, the conviction and sentence could not survive and were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>