<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30904</link>
    <description>Customs officers&#039; statutory power of arrest under the Customs Act operates where they have reason to believe a specified offence has been committed, subject to safeguards such as disclosure of arrest grounds and prompt production before a magistrate. Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC cannot be granted as a blanket shield against unspecified future offences, and protection must rest on concrete, offence-specific facts. Statements recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act are distinct from police statements, and the mere issue of summons does not by itself curtail the customs authorities&#039; arrest powers if objective material later justifies arrest. A High Court direction requiring ten days&#039; prior notice before any non-bailable arrest was therefore impermissible and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 16:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30904</link>
      <description>Customs officers&#039; statutory power of arrest under the Customs Act operates where they have reason to believe a specified offence has been committed, subject to safeguards such as disclosure of arrest grounds and prompt production before a magistrate. Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC cannot be granted as a blanket shield against unspecified future offences, and protection must rest on concrete, offence-specific facts. Statements recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act are distinct from police statements, and the mere issue of summons does not by itself curtail the customs authorities&#039; arrest powers if objective material later justifies arrest. A High Court direction requiring ten days&#039; prior notice before any non-bailable arrest was therefore impermissible and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>