<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Accused&#039;s Defense Fails to Rebut Presumption u/s 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act in Cheque Dishonor Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66482</link>
    <description>Dishonor of Cheque - rebuttal of presumption - Although it is permitted in a case of such nature to raise a probable defence from the available materials in the cross-examination of the prosecution witness only, but the nature of the cross-examination and the probable defence raised by the accused do not qualify as a rebuttal to the provisions under Section 139 of the N.I. Act - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 09:08:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 09:08:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Accused&#039;s Defense Fails to Rebut Presumption u/s 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act in Cheque Dishonor Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66482</link>
      <description>Dishonor of Cheque - rebuttal of presumption - Although it is permitted in a case of such nature to raise a probable defence from the available materials in the cross-examination of the prosecution witness only, but the nature of the cross-examination and the probable defence raised by the accused do not qualify as a rebuttal to the provisions under Section 139 of the N.I. Act - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 09:08:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>