<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 548 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430124</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, answering the substantial question of law in favor of the assessee. The court directed the application of the net profit rate to all receipts as per the tribunal&#039;s order for the assessment years 2004-05 to 2008-09. The court found the assessing officer&#039;s interpretation incorrect and instructed the application of the net profit rate to all receipts, disclosed and undisclosed, within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 22:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 548 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430124</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, answering the substantial question of law in favor of the assessee. The court directed the application of the net profit rate to all receipts as per the tribunal&#039;s order for the assessment years 2004-05 to 2008-09. The court found the assessing officer&#039;s interpretation incorrect and instructed the application of the net profit rate to all receipts, disclosed and undisclosed, within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>