<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 534 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430110</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) erroneously invoked Section 263, as the original assessment by the Assessing Officer (AO) was deemed thorough and not prejudicial to revenue. The PCIT&#039;s direction for reassessment was considered a mere change of opinion, impermissible under Section 263. Consequently, the PCIT&#039;s order was quashed, and the original assessment order by the AO was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 09:02:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 534 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430110</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) erroneously invoked Section 263, as the original assessment by the Assessing Officer (AO) was deemed thorough and not prejudicial to revenue. The PCIT&#039;s direction for reassessment was considered a mere change of opinion, impermissible under Section 263. Consequently, the PCIT&#039;s order was quashed, and the original assessment order by the AO was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>