https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430091 The court dismissed the writ appeal against the order dated 16.09.2021 by a learned single Judge, emphasizing the need for the respondent to complete adjudication proceedings within a specified timeframe following due process of law and principles of natural justice. The court highlighted the importance of independently considering objections in show cause proceedings, clarified the interpretation of Section 28(9) of the Customs Act, 1962, and stressed the necessity of adhering to timelines. The appellant's request for cross-examination of officers and directors was addressed, and the court underscored that decisions in quasi-judicial proceedings are based on the preponderance of probability. en-us Tue, 01 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Jun 2023 11:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430091 The court dismissed the writ appeal against the order dated 16.09.2021 by a learned single Judge, emphasizing the need for the respondent to complete adjudication proceedings within a specified timeframe following due process of law and principles of natural justice. The court highlighted the importance of independently considering objections in show cause proceedings, clarified the interpretation of Section 28(9) of the Customs Act, 1962, and stressed the necessity of adhering to timelines. The appellant's request for cross-examination of officers and directors was addressed, and the court underscored that decisions in quasi-judicial proceedings are based on the preponderance of probability. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 01 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430091