<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 510 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430086</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the appellant in a dispute over the date of filing a refund claim. The tribunal held that the initial filing date, not the resubmission date, was crucial for determining the timeliness of the claim. Emphasizing established legal principles and precedents, the tribunal set aside the order for recovery of the erroneous refund, allowing the appeal and deeming the refund claim timely.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 09:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 510 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430086</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the appellant in a dispute over the date of filing a refund claim. The tribunal held that the initial filing date, not the resubmission date, was crucial for determining the timeliness of the claim. Emphasizing established legal principles and precedents, the tribunal set aside the order for recovery of the erroneous refund, allowing the appeal and deeming the refund claim timely.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>