https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430079 Once an accused has been enlarged on regular bail and that order stands upheld by the Supreme Court, a Magistrate cannot grant police custody under Section 167 CrPC in a manner inconsistent with the subsisting bail order. The High Court noted that custody-remand applications moved after the bail order had attained finality could not be entertained to defeat that order, and the remand controversy had become academic. On that basis, the Court declined to quash the impugned remand orders or grant the custody remand sought, leaving the petitioners without the relief requested. en-us Wed, 09 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Nov 2022 09:00:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430079 Once an accused has been enlarged on regular bail and that order stands upheld by the Supreme Court, a Magistrate cannot grant police custody under Section 167 CrPC in a manner inconsistent with the subsisting bail order. The High Court noted that custody-remand applications moved after the bail order had attained finality could not be entertained to defeat that order, and the remand controversy had become academic. On that basis, the Court declined to quash the impugned remand orders or grant the custody remand sought, leaving the petitioners without the relief requested. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 09 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430079