https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430078 The court held that the Magistrate lacked jurisdiction to permit the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to record statements under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The Special Court (Court of Session) designated under the PMLA had exclusive jurisdiction for such matters. The order of the Magistrate was quashed, and the ED was given the opportunity to file the application before the Special Court as required by law. en-us Mon, 17 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Nov 2022 09:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430078 The court held that the Magistrate lacked jurisdiction to permit the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to record statements under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The Special Court (Court of Session) designated under the PMLA had exclusive jurisdiction for such matters. The order of the Magistrate was quashed, and the ED was given the opportunity to file the application before the Special Court as required by law. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 17 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430078