<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 499 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430075</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s refund claim of Rs. 92,321 for excess Service Tax payment, ruling it was not time-barred as the claim was filed within one year from the actual payment date. Additionally, the Tribunal granted the refund of Rs. 1,04,125 for another excess payment of Rs. 11,804, finding discrepancies in the taxable value calculations. The Commissioner&#039;s decision to reject the refund claim was overturned, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 14:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 499 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430075</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s refund claim of Rs. 92,321 for excess Service Tax payment, ruling it was not time-barred as the claim was filed within one year from the actual payment date. Additionally, the Tribunal granted the refund of Rs. 1,04,125 for another excess payment of Rs. 11,804, finding discrepancies in the taxable value calculations. The Commissioner&#039;s decision to reject the refund claim was overturned, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>