<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1275 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305017</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs.11,86,168 made based on extrapolated findings from sundry creditors outstanding, as confirmed by the CIT(A) for three creditors. Emphasizing that genuine purchases led to sales and liabilities cannot be added under Section 68, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in ITA No. 3520/DEL/2019, highlighting the necessity for a thorough examination of transactions before invoking Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 18:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1275 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305017</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs.11,86,168 made based on extrapolated findings from sundry creditors outstanding, as confirmed by the CIT(A) for three creditors. Emphasizing that genuine purchases led to sales and liabilities cannot be added under Section 68, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in ITA No. 3520/DEL/2019, highlighting the necessity for a thorough examination of transactions before invoking Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>