<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1673 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305016</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the addition of profit embedded in un-reconciled sales, reducing the profit rate from 60% to 7.5% for a more balanced income assessment, recognizing the appellant&#039;s historical trading practices. The decision aimed to rectify the excessive profit rate applied previously and provide a fair resolution without setting a precedent for future assessments. The Tribunal&#039;s focus on a just assessment underscored the need for consistency and reasonableness in determining the appellant&#039;s income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 08:59:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1673 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305016</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the addition of profit embedded in un-reconciled sales, reducing the profit rate from 60% to 7.5% for a more balanced income assessment, recognizing the appellant&#039;s historical trading practices. The decision aimed to rectify the excessive profit rate applied previously and provide a fair resolution without setting a precedent for future assessments. The Tribunal&#039;s focus on a just assessment underscored the need for consistency and reasonableness in determining the appellant&#039;s income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>