https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305015 Imported goods were held to remain classifiable under heading 84717020 rather than 84717030 because earlier co-ordinate Tribunal rulings on identical goods had already settled the classification, and no distinguishing basis was shown. On that settled footing, the revised classification adopted in the impugned order could not stand, and the related denial of exemption and differential duty demand also failed. The impugned order was therefore set aside in favour of the importer. en-us Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Nov 2022 08:59:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305015 Imported goods were held to remain classifiable under heading 84717020 rather than 84717030 because earlier co-ordinate Tribunal rulings on identical goods had already settled the classification, and no distinguishing basis was shown. On that settled footing, the revised classification adopted in the impugned order could not stand, and the related denial of exemption and differential duty demand also failed. The impugned order was therefore set aside in favour of the importer. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305015