<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1817 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305014</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) was not justified in invoking Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the Assessing Officer&#039;s (AO) order was not erroneous and did not prejudice the Revenue. The tribunal emphasized the importance of upholding the AO&#039;s quasi-judicial powers and ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the PCIT&#039;s order and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 08:59:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1817 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305014</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) was not justified in invoking Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the Assessing Officer&#039;s (AO) order was not erroneous and did not prejudice the Revenue. The tribunal emphasized the importance of upholding the AO&#039;s quasi-judicial powers and ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the PCIT&#039;s order and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>