<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1375 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305023</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeals filed by the appellants, setting aside the Division Bench&#039;s order. The respondent&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and he was not granted any relief. The validity of the tenure-based appointment and subsequent recruitment process was upheld, emphasizing principles of delay, laches, acquiescence, and the doctrine of approbate and reprobate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 08:59:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1375 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305023</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeals filed by the appellants, setting aside the Division Bench&#039;s order. The respondent&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and he was not granted any relief. The validity of the tenure-based appointment and subsequent recruitment process was upheld, emphasizing principles of delay, laches, acquiescence, and the doctrine of approbate and reprobate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>