<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 102 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30894</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad due to non-compliance with section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The order was set aside, and the case was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) with the appellant given the liberty to file a stay petition. Subsequently, the appeal and stay petition were disposed of as per the remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 102 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30894</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad due to non-compliance with section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The order was set aside, and the case was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) with the appellant given the liberty to file a stay petition. Subsequently, the appeal and stay petition were disposed of as per the remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>