<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1469 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305031</link>
    <description>Insolvency and Bankruptcy appeals challenging the impugned judgment were not found to raise any cogent ground for interference, and the Supreme Court declined to entertain them. The Court, after hearing counsel and perusing the record, held that the judgment under challenge did not warrant interference and dismissed the appeals. The order reflects a summary refusal to disturb the lower decision in the insolvency matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 08:59:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1469 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305031</link>
      <description>Insolvency and Bankruptcy appeals challenging the impugned judgment were not found to raise any cogent ground for interference, and the Supreme Court declined to entertain them. The Court, after hearing counsel and perusing the record, held that the judgment under challenge did not warrant interference and dismissed the appeals. The order reflects a summary refusal to disturb the lower decision in the insolvency matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>