<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 640 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305003</link>
    <description>A delegated control order vesting licence grant, suspension and cancellation in a specified authority must be exercised independently by that authority, and ministerial prior approval cannot replace the statutory decision-maker&#039;s function. The article further notes that where the scheme requires a final cancellation order within 30 days of suspension and provides a 30-day appeal period from the date of the order, communication is essential to effectiveness; an order kept uncommunicated cannot operate against the affected party. On the stated facts, delayed communication rendered the cancellation ineffective and the suspension could not continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 11:37:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 640 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305003</link>
      <description>A delegated control order vesting licence grant, suspension and cancellation in a specified authority must be exercised independently by that authority, and ministerial prior approval cannot replace the statutory decision-maker&#039;s function. The article further notes that where the scheme requires a final cancellation order within 30 days of suspension and provides a 30-day appeal period from the date of the order, communication is essential to effectiveness; an order kept uncommunicated cannot operate against the affected party. On the stated facts, delayed communication rendered the cancellation ineffective and the suspension could not continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>