https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430057 The SC rejected the applicant's request for clarifying GST registration requirements across multiple states. The ruling highlighted the territorial limitations of the advance ruling authority, specifically that the Telangana authority cannot issue rulings for activities in other states. The application was dismissed due to jurisdictional constraints under Section 96 of the CGST Act, emphasizing the need for state-specific regulatory compliance. en-us Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Apr 2025 18:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430057 The SC rejected the applicant's request for clarifying GST registration requirements across multiple states. The ruling highlighted the territorial limitations of the advance ruling authority, specifically that the Telangana authority cannot issue rulings for activities in other states. The application was dismissed due to jurisdictional constraints under Section 96 of the CGST Act, emphasizing the need for state-specific regulatory compliance. Case-Laws GST Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430057