<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 477 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430053</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the lack of specificity in the penalty initiation notice, rendering the penalty proceedings invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 09:07:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 477 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430053</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the lack of specificity in the penalty initiation notice, rendering the penalty proceedings invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>