<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 469 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430045</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that the assessee and spouse are entitled to a blanket exemption of Rs. 5,00,000 on unexplained cash deposits made during demonetization, based on CBDT instructions. The deposits represented past savings in a single joint account, with no evidence of unaccounted income or assets. The tribunal emphasized that amounts within the prescribed exemption limits (Rs. 2.5 lakh per person, Rs. 5 lakh for those above 70) need not be scrutinized. Considering the assessee&#039;s consistent filing history and submission of supporting evidence, no adverse inference was drawn. The balance amount was deleted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 469 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430045</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that the assessee and spouse are entitled to a blanket exemption of Rs. 5,00,000 on unexplained cash deposits made during demonetization, based on CBDT instructions. The deposits represented past savings in a single joint account, with no evidence of unaccounted income or assets. The tribunal emphasized that amounts within the prescribed exemption limits (Rs. 2.5 lakh per person, Rs. 5 lakh for those above 70) need not be scrutinized. Considering the assessee&#039;s consistent filing history and submission of supporting evidence, no adverse inference was drawn. The balance amount was deleted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>