<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 468 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430044</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, deleting the additions of Rs. 23,23,696/- under Section 68 and Rs. 1,45,421/- under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal concluded that the lower authorities erred in confirming the additions, citing the lack of cogent evidence against the assessee and the denial of cross-examination opportunities, thus emphasizing the principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 09:06:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 468 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430044</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, deleting the additions of Rs. 23,23,696/- under Section 68 and Rs. 1,45,421/- under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal concluded that the lower authorities erred in confirming the additions, citing the lack of cogent evidence against the assessee and the denial of cross-examination opportunities, thus emphasizing the principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>