<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 448 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430024</link>
    <description>Interest awarded under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act on enhanced compensation for compulsory acquisition of agricultural land was treated as an integral part of the compensation itself. Following coordinate bench reasoning, it was characterised as a capital receipt and not independent income from other sources; accordingly, it fell within the exemption under section 10(37) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The addition was deleted and the assessee&#039;s claim succeeded on this issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 448 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430024</link>
      <description>Interest awarded under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act on enhanced compensation for compulsory acquisition of agricultural land was treated as an integral part of the compensation itself. Following coordinate bench reasoning, it was characterised as a capital receipt and not independent income from other sources; accordingly, it fell within the exemption under section 10(37) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The addition was deleted and the assessee&#039;s claim succeeded on this issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>