https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430021 The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of education expenses claimed by the assessee for his daughter's advanced studies in architecture as personal expenditure, not allowable as business expenditure. The Tribunal found the primary purpose of the expenditure to be personal, maintaining the family business legacy, and lacking credibility in the father-daughter agreement. The appeal was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 15th September 2022. en-us Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Nov 2022 09:05:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430021 The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of education expenses claimed by the assessee for his daughter's advanced studies in architecture as personal expenditure, not allowable as business expenditure. The Tribunal found the primary purpose of the expenditure to be personal, maintaining the family business legacy, and lacking credibility in the father-daughter agreement. The appeal was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 15th September 2022. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430021