<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 443 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430019</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the reassessment under Section 147, dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeals. However, the issue of adding Rs. 6.8 crores as unaccounted income was remanded back to the CIT(A) for further examination, emphasizing the need for concrete evidence linking the transactions to the AOP to avoid double taxation and ensure accurate income attribution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 13:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 443 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430019</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the reassessment under Section 147, dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeals. However, the issue of adding Rs. 6.8 crores as unaccounted income was remanded back to the CIT(A) for further examination, emphasizing the need for concrete evidence linking the transactions to the AOP to avoid double taxation and ensure accurate income attribution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>