<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 437 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430013</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the sharing of costs between the appellant and its associated enterprise did not constitute taxable services. The waiver of amounts due to the associated enterprise&#039;s financial condition was not subject to service tax before a specific amendment. The extended period of limitation for issuing the show cause notice was deemed inapplicable due to lack of evidence of suppression. The classification of services under &quot;business support services&quot; was not adequately substantiated. Consequently, the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 09:04:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 437 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430013</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the sharing of costs between the appellant and its associated enterprise did not constitute taxable services. The waiver of amounts due to the associated enterprise&#039;s financial condition was not subject to service tax before a specific amendment. The extended period of limitation for issuing the show cause notice was deemed inapplicable due to lack of evidence of suppression. The classification of services under &quot;business support services&quot; was not adequately substantiated. Consequently, the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>