<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 429 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430005</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the assessee were allowed for statistical purposes, with directions for de novo adjudication on certain issues. The appeals filed by the revenue were dismissed as infructuous due to the quashing of the assessment orders. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following judicial precedents and ensuring that assessment orders are passed in the name of the correct legal entity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 17:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 429 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430005</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the assessee were allowed for statistical purposes, with directions for de novo adjudication on certain issues. The appeals filed by the revenue were dismissed as infructuous due to the quashing of the assessment orders. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following judicial precedents and ensuring that assessment orders are passed in the name of the correct legal entity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>