<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1799 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304988</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, ruling that the reclassification of business loss as speculation loss did not constitute furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The penalty notices were deemed invalid due to lack of clarity, following precedents from the Karnataka High Court and Bombay High Court. Consequently, the penalty imposed by the AO was dropped, and the appeal by the assessee was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 21:36:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1799 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304988</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, ruling that the reclassification of business loss as speculation loss did not constitute furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The penalty notices were deemed invalid due to lack of clarity, following precedents from the Karnataka High Court and Bombay High Court. Consequently, the penalty imposed by the AO was dropped, and the appeal by the assessee was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>