https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304986 SC dismissed the appeal and affirmed the HC: a general cancellation clause did not permit unilateral termination of supplies already covered by a formal order specifying quantities and delivery dates. The court held the acceptance and subsequent formal order created a binding contract obliging the respondent to deliver and the appellant to accept; the March cancellation was invalid as to those formal orders. The appellant was bound by the contract terms, the respondent could recover damages for breach, and costs were awarded against the appellant. en-us Thu, 09 May 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Aug 2025 11:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304986 SC dismissed the appeal and affirmed the HC: a general cancellation clause did not permit unilateral termination of supplies already covered by a formal order specifying quantities and delivery dates. The court held the acceptance and subsequent formal order created a binding contract obliging the respondent to deliver and the appellant to accept; the March cancellation was invalid as to those formal orders. The appellant was bound by the contract terms, the respondent could recover damages for breach, and costs were awarded against the appellant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 May 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304986