https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304984 Delegated power under the railway establishment rules was treated as sufficient to support prosecution sanction, and the objection that only a different officer could sanction was rejected. The trap and investigation were not vitiated because the magistrate's role in arranging the trap was not treated as investigation, and no breach of the prescribed rank requirement or resulting prejudice was shown. Recovery of the marked currency note, corroboration by trap witnesses, and rejection of the defence version supported proof of illegal gratification; the concurrent findings were not disturbed, and the conviction and sentence were sustained. en-us Thu, 28 Mar 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Nov 2022 14:46:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304984 Delegated power under the railway establishment rules was treated as sufficient to support prosecution sanction, and the objection that only a different officer could sanction was rejected. The trap and investigation were not vitiated because the magistrate's role in arranging the trap was not treated as investigation, and no breach of the prescribed rank requirement or resulting prejudice was shown. Recovery of the marked currency note, corroboration by trap witnesses, and rejection of the defence version supported proof of illegal gratification; the concurrent findings were not disturbed, and the conviction and sentence were sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Mar 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304984