https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304982 Acceptance of illegal gratification by a public servant attracted the statutory presumption under section 4(1) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, and that presumption was not rebutted because no material showed a reasonable probability of lawful receipt. Evidence of demand, acceptance, and recovery of tainted currency with anthracene powder on the appellant's hands supported the prosecution case. For section 161 of the Indian Penal Code, actual ability to perform the promised official act was unnecessary where office was used to extract money. The objection to the charge failed because the accused was sufficiently informed of the accusation, no prejudice was shown, and any irregularity was cured by section 537 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. en-us Fri, 16 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Nov 2022 13:23:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304982 Acceptance of illegal gratification by a public servant attracted the statutory presumption under section 4(1) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, and that presumption was not rebutted because no material showed a reasonable probability of lawful receipt. Evidence of demand, acceptance, and recovery of tainted currency with anthracene powder on the appellant's hands supported the prosecution case. For section 161 of the Indian Penal Code, actual ability to perform the promised official act was unnecessary where office was used to extract money. The objection to the charge failed because the accused was sufficiently informed of the accusation, no prejudice was shown, and any irregularity was cured by section 537 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304982